STARR gets its EHR data from the two Epic Clarity at the two hospitals. Differences between Epic Hyperspace and Clarity The two Epic Clarity databases have the most usable research data. SHC takes the operational Clarity data and converts it to an operational Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW) with a number of different subject marts. Stanford researchers do not have access to Caboodle for research purpose at this time. LPCH has an advanced implementation of Caboodle and SHC has an early implementation of Caboodle. The two hospitals have different Epic ecosystems. For example, LPCH has a MSSQL Clarity and SHC has an Oracle Clarity. Chronicles is a non-relational database that sends data to Clarity, which is a relational database, and is used for advanced reporting. Much of the data that is stored in the Chronicles database gets copied over to Clarity, which is a relational database that allows analysts to create more detailed and complex reports. Chronicles is the main database that runs much of the Epic software. When a nurse, doctor, therapist, or administrative staff launch Epic, the front-end software that is presented to them is called Hyperspace. Epic Hyperspace is configured to display different menus, tasks, and options to users depending on their specific roles. Epic Clarity contains data from the clinics that are part of the University Healthcare Alliance and Lucile Packard Healthcare Alliance.Ĭlinicians at the hospitals interact with the product Epic Hyperspace. Epic Hyperspace is not a clinical module in itself, but rather the application client that is presented to users of most areas of Epic. The two hospitals use Epic for patient care and share Epic Clarity data with SoM. And to all our volunteers, thank you for your patience and commitment throughout the coming transition.STARR has access to electronic health record (EHR) data from the two hospitals, the Adult Hospital (aka Stanford Health Care) and Children’s Hospital (aka Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital). Stay tuned for updates on how the new EHR will positively impact patient care and our ability to analyze data-something critical to program evaluation and improvement. We expect to go “live” with Epic in the first half of 2020. We are working closely with our VHC colleagues to develop creative strategies-involving technology and the training of scribes to assist our volunteer physicians in using the new system. Others are unique to Epic, including the considerable training requirements placed on all system users-a condition that will be a unique challenge with AFC’s volunteer model. Some, such as preparing and mapping our data, are to be expected as with any EHR conversion. However, a transition of this magnitude will come with challenges. Sharing of healthcare information between medical providers is an essential component of good care. I’d like to extend an enormous thank you to VHC for offering to bring us onto its Epic account at no cost to AFC, and to provide both training and tech support to ensure our successful conversion!Īn Epic Transition to a New Electronic Health Record System Since we partner so closely with VHC, being on the same EHR will prove invaluable. However, AFC’s EHR was implemented 10 years ago and no longer provides the level of support needed to deliver quality, coordinated care.Īfter taking a year to carefully weigh our options, AFC is pleased to announce plans to convert to a new EHR called Epic, which our closest partner, Virginial Hospital Center (VHC), adopted in 2018. Research shows that enabling quick access to complete, up-to-date patient information supports more coordinated, efficient care that improves health outcomes. They give real-time information on everything from medical history and diagnoses, to allergies, medications, and lab results. ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) are digital versions of patient charts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |